US civic freedoms now “Obstructed”

Civicus, and a coalition of global civil society organizations has downgraded the United States’ civic health rating from “narrowed” to “obstructed”. Our nation was formed as a vehicle for bestowing freedoms – of speech, of the press, of peaceful assembly, and more. The downgrading is a response to government actions as recent as “since July, 2025.”

How does that affect each of us, personally? As my personal interest is in improving the sustainability of our lifestyle, suspension of environmental regulations and discontinuance of federal programs aimed at supporting things such as clean wind and solar energy, emission-free electric cars has our country moving in the exact opposite direction as most nations are taking and as we all need to live in order to enjoy healthy lives.

When Social Security was enacted in 1935, only one half of one percent of the population lived to 65, the year at which benefits kick in. Now, medical technology has enabled so-called first-world countries to enjoy increasingly longer life spans.  However, lifespans in the U.S. are now inching backwards!

Sustainable Living benefits apply to health as well as to our quality-of-life experience. Our literacy levels are dropping. Our education and health care systems are falling increasingly behind that of other nations. The question:  What can we do as individuals to reverse the trend?  Comments afterwards.

Civicus, a non-profit that monitors global civic freedoms,

moved the US from the ‘narrowed’ to ‘obstructed’ category

Maya Yang

The Guardian

Tue 9 Dec 2025

A coalition of global civil society organizations has downgraded the United States’ civic health rating from “narrowed” to “obstructed”.

In a report released on Tuesday, Civicus, a non-profit that monitors civic freedoms in 198 countries, placed the US in its “obstructed” category. The group cited a “sharp deterioration of fundamental freedoms in the country … following a year of sweeping executive actions, restrictive laws and aggressive crackdowns on free speech and dissent.”

The shift comes just months after Civicus’s July assessment, which rated  the US as “narrowed” – one step above “obstructed”. Civicus assigns each country a score based on civic space conditions, using five classifications: “open”, “narrowed”, “obstructed”, “repressed” and “closed”.

According to the group, an “obstructed” ranking applies to countries where civic space is heavily contested. Civil society organizations still exist but state authorities undermine them including through illegal surveillance, bureaucratic harassment and demeaning public statements. The rating description said

It added in regards to media:

The report cited militarized crackdowns on protests in the US, pointing to Donald Trump’s deployment of the national guard to Los Angeles and other cities, as well as the widespread use of ICE agents across gatherings and immigrant communities.

It further highlighted escalating restrictions on free speech across college campuses, particularly around Palestinian solidarity activism. The report stated …

Civicus moreover warned that media freedoms were under mounting pressure nationwide, citing the Federal Communications Commission’s threats to revoke broadcast licenses and Trump’s lawsuits against various media companies.

It also pointed to Trump’s revocation of funding for public broadcasters including NPR and PBS, as well as the new White House Wire, an administration-run news website that promotes positive news about itself. Civicus said …

Speaking about the latest classification, Mandeep Tiwana, Civicus’s secretary general, said:

He continued:

With its new classification, the US now joins 39 other countries rated “obstructed” this year, including Hungary, Brazil and South Africa.

My own personal efforts have been to create a net zero sustainable community – and share the lessons learned from actual experience, write three inexpensive books to help others live more sustainably, to send out a free weekly blog with research reports about things being done globally that we can do individually, research ways to adjust our lifestyles more comfortably, and share lessons I’m learning as I continue to experiment with different aspects of Sustainable Living.

If I were wealthy, leading a large corporate development company, I’d probably want to build thousands of sustainable homes, as we may learn better from experience, and so I could create a new “normal.” As I’m not wealthy, I’m leaning toward providing the best, most research-proven information via social media and books.  Adding D’s comments …

Comments are closed.